|
Although
the title given to this article is a bit frivolous, the research in this field
certainly is not.
A bit of history first... The concept of edible vaccines is nowhere as recent as you would expect it to be. The idea was first put forth by Dr. Charles Arntzen (then a Professor at University of Texas A&M) 10 years ago as an inexpensive and painless way to deliver vaccines which would be especially useful in developing countries like India. Prototype vaccines were developed even at that early stage, however with relatively poor understanding of the bacterial/viral genomes back then, the success rate was limited. Image : The Lord and Master of Edible vaccine research, Dr. Charles Arntzen.
Around 1995-1996, tests using edible vaccines in mice began to become impressively successful. The mice, which were fed potatoes which contained antigens, showed a good systemic and mucosal response (more about mucosal immunity later...) to these antigens. The first diseases that the mice were immunized against included cholera, ETEC and hepatitis B. Human trials were first conducted at around 1996-1997. Only a few trials have been conducted to date , and an edible vaccine is a long way off. But judging from the results of the trials, the "edible vaccine" or "Biotech Bannana" is anything but impossible... Had enough of TP?? ok...:) sorry... lets see how you can:
In short the process is this : You mess around with the genetic code of the plant (more on how to do this later..) and introduce a gene which codes for a particular protein antigen (bacterial/viral) into its genome. (Producing what is called a transgenic organism, or an organism which contains genes belonging to one or more organisms e.g. transgenic pigs which have human organs)
Now as this genetically modified plant grows, it synthesizes the protein
antigen along with the normal plant proteins.
Simple isn't it... well actually not quite... Introducing the bacterial/viral gene can be a messy process. Since the discussion about that subject is a bit technical, I have placed it at the very end of this article.
Whoa! Now that all the technical stuff is behind us, we can take a look at what exactly this new approach to vaccination has achieved so far... 1)
Animal Trials :
Image : A mouse contemplating some nice looking potatoes while sitting over some tomatoes...lol..just kidding...had to write something....
2)
Human Trials : A recent study conducted by Arntzen involved the Norwalk Virus (which causes diarrhea). In this study, 19 out of 20 persons showed increases in the serum antibody levels.
Similarly, after Hilary Krapowski of Thomas Jefferson University fed transgenic lettuce carrying a hepatitis B antigen to three volunteers, two of the subjects displayed a good systemic response. Scientists are even toying around with the idea of introducing some HIV genes into plants thus developing an edible HIV vaccine!]
Advantages: 1)
Although the technology at first seems like something done for convenience
rather than being something of significant utility, the fact is that
poorly developed nations like India
which have a relatively poor vaccination program are most likely to benefit from
such a vaccine. Image : No caption required I think...
2) Mucosal immunity : The vaccines which are given parenterally (e.g. Intramuscularly) induce a systemic response but little or no local immune response in the GI tract. This so called "mucosal immunity " is increasingly being considered very important for defense against GI pathogens. ( Remember OPV..) 3) And of course, it's painless and convenient
1) The vaccine dose would be inadequate if the patient eats only one banana/potato instead of the recommended two. Furthermore, there might be difficulties in judging the dose itself since the amount of antigen in each fruit cannot be accurately measured. 2) The risk of
introducing a new gene into the Plant DNA population is not known.
The gene may jump species and propagate into other plants (or wild varieties of
the same plants). 3)"Oral
Tolerance": In another concern, scientists need to be
sure that vaccines meant to enhance immune responses do not backfire and
suppress immunity instead. Research into a phenomenon called oral tolerance has
shown that ingesting certain proteins can at times cause the body to shut down
its responses to those proteins.
According
to Dr. Cummins of the "Organics Consumer union" (US) :
-
Oncogen Additional Notes : Ahh.. lets get down to some nitty gritty shall we? Why
bananas?
Unexpected benefits: Remember the "oral
tolerance" thing I mentioned earlier? Well it can be put to
constructive use in autoimmunity:
HEY! You still haven't mentioned how you can get the viral/Bacterial gene inside the plant DNA!!! Still interested? Click on the link below for an explanation (I'll let you in on a secret.. this is THE most interesting part of the article): How
to get a viral/Bacterial gene inside Plant DNA
|